Corporate Accountability CRP :: essays research papers

ism Corporate AccountabilityCorporate accountability is an important subject in todays society, in reading Corporate Culpability beneath the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, by Jennifer Moore it is obvious that she feels very strongly that corporations argon non being held accountable for their actions. Jennifer argues that employees are often blamed for their actions, but are scarcely complying with their job. This is very insightful, and I find it very hard to dissent with her logic. She starts her argument by rejecting the idea that it is sometimes difficult to locate the special(prenominal) collective agents responsible for a criminal act (171). The rejection is not meant to popularise that it is always easy to find the psyche at blame, but simply that this point has to do with prosecutors evidence and not the philosophical issue. Jennifer believes that because responsibility is break throughout many different areas in the corporation, and decisions follow the same path , there may in fact be no individual or group of individuals that is justly to blame for the crime (171). The idea that many of us notice everyday, in many cases we as employees act blindly in accordance with policy, not exerting any control over the situations, and can and so not be held accountable. In this respect the corporation is to be held accountable.From my viewpoint, sequence I represent the political party during work hours, and the company reaps the benefits of my good nature, they should withal bear the responsibility of my actions. If I treat a customer rudely, the customer treats that as an indication of my character, and a reflection on the company. When a person enters employment with a certain company, that company is accepting responsibility for actions interpreted by the employee that are in accordance with company policy. The corporation should be held responsible by the government, while the corporation should hold its declare employees responsible for t heir own actions. In response to the idea of a corporate responsibility, not an individuals, many argue that if the corporation is not a person, how can it be held to the same moral guidelines as an individual? afterwards all, dont people pull the decisions, and those same people make up the corporations, and should therefore be held accountable. This theory does not exclude the incident of upper management being held responsible rather it includes it for the sake of the companys survival.