The North Korean Nuclear Crisis Essay examples -- Weapons Nuclear Kore

The Nuclear Crisis of 1993The question of a atomic trade union Korea has roots dating back to the 1980s. Initial concerns arose in the mid-1980s, with intelligence reports proposing the potential for North Korean nuclear ambitions. Reports cite the facial expression of a nuclear nuclear reactor capable of producing weapons-grade atomic number 94 . The reactor in question, located in Yongbyon, was the focus of the archetypal North Korean nuclear crisis in 1993. The Clinton judgeship proceeded with diplomatic efforts, forging an agreement by 1994 that effectu wholey ended the crisis. Under the Agreed Framework, North Korea agreed to (1) pick up operation and construction of nuclear reactors, (2) freeze reprocessing of spent fuel (from which plutonium can be derived to make nuclear weapons), and (3) allow IAEA inspectors to monitor nuclear facilities. In return, the US agreed to (1) lead an international consortium in the construction of two proliferation-resistant light- water reactors (LWR), and (2) supply fuel oil until the first reactor is deemed operational . The Current Crisis in BriefThe current crisis officially began in October 2002, when a visiting US delegation, led by Assistant depositary of State James Kelly, confronted North Korean officials with evidence of a nuclear weapons political platform (using enriched uranium, as opposed to the plutonium used in its first weapons program). Pyongyang admitted to the program?s existence, stating, ?We pull up stakes meet the sword with the sword. ? The US, southerly Korea, and Japan subsequently halted all shipment of fuel oil to North Korea, in November, on the grounds that the once covert nuclear program was in violation of the Agreed Framework. In December, North Korea announced the reactivation of its nuc... ...?we will not attack you? if all nuclear ambitions are abandoned . The governing body should also make good on its proposition to agree on a system in which ?corresponding me asures? are taken on both sides to resolve the crisis. It will be imperative to develop a verifiable means of dismantling Pyongyang?s weapons program. Furthermore, the focus of prox dialogues should be on the issue of nuclear dismantlement, straying from the topic as sparingly as possible.As President Bush and other administration officials have reminded the international community, and in particular North Korea, ultimately ?all options are on the table.?Given the current status of dialogues and continued willingness of countries in the region to proceed with diplomatic efforts, however, the option for military action is efficaciously taken off the table for the US for the time being.