Evaluate the Strategic Leadership of Michael O’leary

Is Michael OLeary an asset or a liability to Ryanair? The grapheme suggests that he is both. Students could debate the pros and cons of Michael OLearys continued leadership of the company. The characteristics that develop driven the company forward his enthusiasm and energy, his strategic insight, his determination and thrill orientation can be carried too far. Is it all part of an incorporated inseparable whole, so do you flummox to take the good with the pitiful?Is this where we may enter the realm of Sidney Finkelsteins failure warning signs, when you have too much of a good thing? In fact, well-nigh schools of thought would value Michael OLearys relentless energy and his well-fixed on adversity. It shows a lack of complacency quite the opposite of what Finkelstein points unwrap as a danger signal. The capacity to irritate may take on about conflict and change. Also, in Michael OLearys favour, as Ryanairs largest single shareholder, he literally puts his money where hi s mouth is.Another behavior of looking at Michael OLearys leadership is whether he was the undecomposed person for the job during the change era, but does the company now charter more of a manager than a leader during a integration era? In other words, this is a horses for courses approach to the evaluation of OLearys leadership. One may ask whether and/or for how much long-run Michael OLeary wants to stay in the job. Will he get bore and retire to his cattle farm, currently his hobby?There is a proposition that he would not be happy to preside over a static comfortable situation. Or, would he be headhunted by another air passage or by another business altogether? Students might have whether they would headhunt Michael OLeary, and why or why not. Chapter 10 discusses types of leaders, i. e. transformational versus transactional and types of leadership emphases and approaches. It is an enkindle exercise to see how students would categorise Michael OLeary. Perhaps what emerge s is that he is strong to categorise. What does this imply?