Church and Government Essay

According to Article II, section 6 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution pleads that, the judicial separation of church service and bow shall be impregnable and Article III, Section 5 secernates, No law shall be made respecting an goerning of morality, or prohibiting the resign exercise thereof. . The forfeit exercise and enjoyment of religious trading and worship, with place discrimination or preference, shall be unendingly be allowed. No religious political campaign shall be required for the exercise of polite or political rights.Given the articles of the typography regarding the relationship of the church and the put up, is the Catholic Church violating the principle of the Separation of Church and State by daring to utter out against indisputable bills?First, what does the separation of the church and landed e extract rightfully operator? The separation of the state means that the state does non agree an official religion. It means that the wad atomic num ber 18 free to choose in what religion depending in their own depression. It also means that there should be no laws that shall be pass that favors a religion over the other. It also means that there should be no discrimination of the religion and belief of the people. In short, what the union of the church and the state really means is that the citizens should be strained to follow a particular tenet and those that do not follow should be penalized.We can see from banners outside of cathedrals the popular phrase No to RH Bill, Yes to Life. only if can we consider this action as a violation of the constitution? The separation of the church and the state does not keep an eye on that church officials cannot speak or supply to influence the state policy. Since the Philippines is a pop country, every person, group and organization is free to express their own opinion regarding certain issues. The church does not force people to go against a certain bills the finis still lies in the people concord to their conscience and understanding. It means that the church is not violating the constitution since it is only expressing its right to speak in order of its belief.Given the reasons above, that the Philippines has no state religion and given that the state does not subsidize the church, and that no church has any official access to the instruments of state power, I believe that the church does not violate the constitution and that there is really a separation of the church and the state.