'How to Write a Research Paper Essay\r'

'â€Å"This should be sent to a journal” â€Å"Very penny-pinching convey, but I’m non sure why Alan Bundy hasn’t written this? ” Anonymous review: â€Å"Clearly the agent fails to understands Walsh’s previous mesh on this progeny” • 1st Lesson • weary’t lose centre of attention • Even if you do eitherthing right, reviewing is imperfect upright c everyplace bequeath be jilted But try to learn from your knock-backs! • • wherefore you? • Academic c atomic number 18er • issue or perish • Have an impact • • say your results Many get under ones skin not had the impact they merit for being dismal bring throughrs • musical composition is fun! delimitate • How to get your freshlyscomposition light upon knowner jilted.\r\nThere are many a(prenominal) traps even surface experienced researchers make Myself very more than included • †¢ Hints ab discover how to deliver a paper • composition is a craft not a science! How to be rejected • rent over-length • subterfuge man: send in 7 pages even though the instructions understandably say 5 Once they see quality of work, they’ll be sunny you sent in more material • How to be rejected Submit over-length • • Diplomatic immunity: effect extra 2 pages in appendix Appendices clearly don’t study Similarly, bibliography doesn’t count • • How to be rejected • Submit over-length • LaTeX hack: • • • change from 11 to 9 point lawsuit squeeze inter-line space …\r\n• No unrivaled will ever notice How to be rejected • Submit late • • • Deadlines are meant for everyone else Review schedules have potbelly of slack Your paper is price the wait! How to be rejected • You don’t have get on for space wasters like: • Motivation , Background, associate work • Why do review forms al substances have these on them in any event? How to be rejected • g each ref/ observer • • • • Proof is bootless, when it isn’t Prove the trivial Fail to hang their work Only cite yourself How to be rejected • Annoy contracter/ referee • Don’t bother to spell microprocessor chip • What do computers know active spelling any substance?\r\nUse any the old cliches • â€Å"There has been a lot of interest late in spheric simplenesss. ” How to be rejected • Annoy indorser/reviewer • Be pompous, boring, … • This is science not literature guys, who verbalise it should be fun? • Be overly glob • Theorems and formulas add weight How to be rejected • Annoy reader/reviewer • straighten out them re each(prenominal)y work • After any, these are dif? cult c formerlypts and it besidesk you some sentence … • Ignore reviews • Just keep sending paper in, eventually it will be accepted How to keep a paper • Hints about how to draw up • • • expression pen itself Ethics Preparation.\r\nRead, read, read! • To learn how to issue, read a lot • I spend over 20% of my clock interpret • 1 daytime/week in library Read, Read, Read • Related literature • • • So you bath cite it So you don’t re-invent wheels So you know what others conceptualise are important research questions Read, Read, Read • former(a) company/journal papers where you intend to break • • So you learn the â€Å"house” style So you can place your work within the larger picture So you learn how to ask good questions • Read, Read, Read • Any sort of literature • Magazines, novels, biographies, … • Writing is a skill, learn from others •\r\nI read approx one no vel/week as a commission of trying to learn how to write And I have the luxury of writing in my own delivery! • Review, Review, Review • Review as a lot as you can • • • So you see good/bad writing So you see the newest results (but see ethics) So you ask yourself good questions • What is the contribution here? What are the weaknesses? … compose, Write, Write • The best preparation to writing is to write • • Writing gets easier the more you do it Writing is easier if you’ve drafted much of what you already need Writing is the best way to organize your thoughts Writing is a good way to record what you have do.\r\n• • Writing • Work out the timet able-bodied • • • Rushed papers frequently rejected modern papers are almost always rejected If you always write to deadlines, writing will have the appearance _or_ semblance more painful than it is Writing • Work out the messag e • You should be able to convey this in one sentence • â€Å"We propose a new global constraint, pass on a ? ltering algorithm and generate it useful on some standard benchmarks” Writing • Work out the message • You should be able to convey this in one sentence • â€Å"We happen upon an important class of symmetry, and show how to break it” • Write to the message! Writing •\r\nDistribute the work • • happen to your strengths If you have a native speaker, have them write intro/conclusion … • Write to length • brutally cut papers are frequently rejected Writing • • Structure paper before you write it I write template for paper with sections and subsection headings ? rst • Intro, Background, Theoretical results, Empirical results, Related work, Conclusions Writing • • conk out where you are most happy Often write from the middle outwards • Theoretical results , Experiments, … , Conclusions, macrocosm, Abstract Writing • • Rule of Three Say everything 3 times! • • •\r\nIntroduce idea (introduction) Develop idea (body of paper) add up result (conclusions) • But don’t counterpart verbatim the same schoolbook! Title • Make it meaningful and brief • • Don’t make a joke Remember someone reading reference needs to be able to work out likely contents Good: the TSP leg transition hazardous: Easy Problems are sometimes Hard • • Abstract • Executive summary • deform for one sentence or so on: • • • • Motivation Method Key result Conclusions Introduction • • • • What is the fuss? Why is it interesting? What are your contributions? What is the precis of what you will show? Introduction.\r\n• Lure the reader in a with a good ? rst sentence • Bad: There has been a lot of work recently on phase transition behaviour… Good: Global constraints are central to the success of constraint programming… • Background • Often need to dress out scene • • • De? ne formalism Get reader up to speed Identify research problem Body of Paper • • • • Derive theoretical results resolve new algorithm Describe system engineered … Results • heater proof paper • Theoretical results • Experiments only provide a limited view • Experimental results • hypothesis doesn’t show if results are useful in practice.\r\nRelated work • Has many purposes • • • You give strait-laced credit to prior work You are not re-inventing wheel You can compare what you do with what has been make before Conclusions • • Remind reader of what you have done Place work in wider context • â€Å"What customary lessons might be learnt from this study? ” • Fl ag all the exciting open research directions Acknowledgements • Thank all who have helped you • Provided code, data sets, … • Thank ? nancial sponsors Writing • aliment it simple! • • • • Active, not passive Present, not early(prenominal) or future Long words of a sudden sentences Writing •\r\nAvoid temptation to include every result you have • • • Paper needs to be coherent Paper needs to be apprehensible Many papers are rejected for having too many results! Ethics of Writing • • • • Authorship mention Submission Publication Authorship • Who should be an root? • Anyone who has made a signi? cant contribution may not have written any text! Always err on the side of admonish • • Authorship • Who should be an author? • • • Ask! You’ll be surprised how often people refuse You can be sure they’ll not work with you onc e more if they feel they should be Authorship • Should my advisor be an author?\r\nIn ? rst few years of thesis, in all probability yes .. Once you graduate, you should (be able to) write papers on your own Again, ask! • Citation • Cite all relevant work • • • Reviews always ask about Related Work You’ll want them to cite you It’s central to the scienti? c method • We stand on the shoulders of others Citation • Do I cite myself for a blind review? • • • Yes! You must credit all previous work Either cite [Author, 2004] Or write â€Å"As Walsh has shown previously [Walsh 2004] … ” Submission • toilet I submit to multiple conferences? • What’s the repugn with the disclaimer (”This paper is not under review ..”)?\r\n• Can I submit to a journal immediately? • • No hard and fast rules My rule, once reviews are back and paper is effectively in pre ss … Publication • Can I publish my conference paper as it is in a journal? • Probably not, even though conference is not archival Most journals ask you to put out conference paper substantially • • Proofs, more experiments, … nett words • It takes time to learn how to write • Don’t be put off if at ? rst your have papers rejected All of us have papers rejected • • Spend time learning how to write • It will be worth the investment.\r\n'