Reading Analysis Of Two Essays

Douglas Rushkuff in his article Why we listen to what they say communication about how the media coerce young adults and the youth to lie to themselves with insidious , confusing , non-conformist and irrational campaign ads . The purpose of the agent was to apologise to the reader just how the media manipulates its audience into buying something that they site with and how the genesis X has responded to their manipulations . While Misia Landau in her report on How media madness touches children attempt to convince the reader that media military group as back up by scientific interrogation are injurious to children . Rushkuff s (2000 ) initiation of his ideas followed a cause-and-effect format wherein he first hash outed the reasons why media consultants and strike out names changed the story of their ads and the m essage it sends , then goes on to discuss and give evidence of just how this changes coerced the viewing popular to delineate with the brand . On the early(a) hand , Landau (2001 ) utilise an effect-oriented format wherein she try to give examples of the effect that media violence arrive at on children s health . For both articles , one has to read it throughout in to understand what each is trying to say , stave , Landau had a better way of presenting the effects based on research conducted by a reputable organization , magical man Rushkuff s interchange seem to be much of a expression than evidenced by hard facts . Landau was probably trying to find parents in her report and she made a good reconcile in it by giving examples specifically those involving children , patch Ruskuff by chance commanded to reach young adults or the youth provided his style was more than inclined to readers with an academic orientation .

His reciprocation where somewhat rhetorical and difficult to follow given that he tend to jump from one idea to the next , age Landau was simply reporting to her audience how media violence affects children , there s no difficulty with that . The two essays are similar in the sorcerer that they present the negative side of media , one violence the separate is product marketing , they were also at the same smelling that media is a powerful tool that can be ill-used and manipulated by other people to the detriment of children and a soul s sense of self . They were different though in their approaches , Landau was more of an easy reading her evidences supported her arguments while Rushkuff s art icle was diffuclt to suffer in one reading . Thus , Landau is more legal in getting her point across her readersReferencesLandau . M (2001 . How media violence touches children . FOCUSRushkuff , D (2000 . Coercion : Why we listen to what they say . FRONTLINE...If you indispensableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper